Leftist historians in india

26.10.2020 By Tygonris

The Allahabad High Court judgment on the Ram Janmabhoomi, delivered on September 30,caused great discomfort to left historians and commentators.

This discomfort has now increased with the Supreme Court setting up a panel for mediation on this issue with a time limit of eight weeks. The launch of this book led to systemic efforts to project that Rama was not a historical figure, Ayodhya was a mythical city and, more importantly, worshipping Rama was a phenomenon which started not more than years ago.

As one goes through the accounts of foreign travellers, too, like William Finch and the Austrian Jesuit Joseph Tieffenthaler, who toured Awadh between andone finds out how committed and attached Hindus were to the birth place of Lord Rama. The fact is a large number of Muslims also support the construction of the Ram Temple. The issue of whether Lord Rama was born there or not, and whether a temple existed, has already been decided upon by the Allahabad HC.

Now the dispute is over a piece of land and it is a title suit in the SC. But still, attempts are being made to turn this issue into a Hindu-Muslim dispute by left commentators and historians. They have been, it seems, stung by the fact that contrary to the common expectation that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh RSS would react strongly against the recent direction of the apex court, the RSS has refused to play into the hands of its detractors.

Thus, attempts have begun to discredit the panel itself. Ever since the mediation panel has been set up, there have been concerted attempts to raise doubts about the credentials of Sri Sri Ravishankar.

Sri Sri has never intimidated institutions nor has he ever argued that violence would ensue if temple is not built. He has been honoured by the governments of several countries for his peace efforts and is a well-known international figure in the field of conflict resolution. Just because he is Hindu and a spiritual guru, he has become the target of the left. His organisation, The Art of Living, is known to run a large number of social welfare projects.

Click here to join our channel indianexpress and stay updated with the latest headlines.

The history of the Left in India: From freedom struggle to being freed of Tripura

Must Read. Home Opinion Columns Leftist historians, commentators have a flawed understanding of Babri case Leftist historians, commentators have a flawed understanding of Babri case Attempts are being made to turn Babri issue into a Hindu-Muslim dispute by left commentators and historians. Written by Arun Anand Updated: March 13, am.

Yahudi dharm in english

Best of Express Tractor rally on Republic Day: No headway at police-farmer unions meeting PM Modi likely to receive Covid vaccine shot in second phase Entertainment Ankita Lokhande pays tribute to Sushant Singh Rajput: 'Will always remember you' Entertainment Amit Sadh on Jeet Ki Zid: Feel lucky that I got to portray a real-life hero Trending Donald Trump's letter for Joe Biden triggers hilarious guesses online Trending Watch: Firefighter jumps into frozen pond to rescue trapped dog, wins praise online Why stand-in Rahane is being seen as a permanent Test captain Sports Pujara shares what his family was going through while watching the fiercest battle Opinion The triumph Down Under is a win to cherish.

Here are five advanced features every user should know Lifestyle Amanda Gorman wore jewellery gifted by Oprah Winfrey; paid tribute to Maya Angelou.T here are few academics in India more hated by the Right-wing and more admired by those who value scholarship than Romila Thapar. Two, she is a fierce critic, as are most serious historians now, of the colonial segmentation of the study of Indian history into Hindu, Islamic and British periods.

The dislike for Thapar among the Right-wing goes deeper, embedded in the belief, widely popularised on social media, that a Left-liberal monopoly on scholarship in India, an outcome of Nehruvian democracy, has denied Hindus their rightful place in history.

The ongoing campaign by Romila Thapar and others to discredit Hindu civilisation is a war of cultural genocide. By your unfortunate selection of Thapar, America is now aiding and abetting this effort. Thapar, who wrote the textbooks on Ancient India for Class VI, objected to the changes made without her permission and said it was part of propaganda to win forthcoming elections in Uttar Pradesh and Punjab. That was in She has stayed away from state honours, even when given by supposedly favourable governments, as in the award of Padma Bhushan in and then again inwriting to the President on both occasions.

Copii spun lucruri trasnite

But she has never shied away from a fight — whether it is speaking on the absolute necessity of the public intellectual in India to question the state inor moving the Supreme Court last year, for instance, against the arrest of five activists —Gautam Navalakha, Sudha Bharadwaj, Varavara Rao, Arun Ferreira and Vernon Gonsalves — for their alleged involvement in the Bhima Koregaon violence. She is the aunt, among others, of the well-connected socialite Malavika Singh, wildlife activist Valmik Thapar and cousin to star anchor Karan Thapar.

At 87, she remains active, writing, reading, protesting, and living a fabulously solitary and singular life in her two-storey Maharani Bagh home, whose every flat surface is covered with books. That spirit of independence burns brightly in her still, even as she laments the absence of contemporary debate on the kind of India we live in. In this confrontation, universities and the educational system are, and will continue to be, obvious targets.

Education can easily be converted into indoctrination. India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

कन्हैया ने समझाया \

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here. Support Our Journalism. Romila Thapar — The mother who gave birth to all untruths about India with her distorted opinions and fabricated ideologies.

As truth unfolds, she will be remembered for sure — more as a distortionist of Indian history than a historian. Sorry to say, I am aghast at myself of having touched the books that you authored I never had any regard for your written gibberish anyway!

leftist historians in india

Your untruths will never be forgotten. Shameful pseudo-intellectuals carrying hatred and bias pretend as scholars and seers of the truth.

Thapar, as you age and prepare for impending departure from this world, my request is: Please learn to speak the truth.

Do you have an idea how much damage you have done, because of your selfish agendas, fame and greed? She is critical case of Stockholm syndrome, where people start romancing there abusers. She was only popular because in past Congress wanted to appease Muslim votes by destroying Hindu religion.

Basically she gained her popularity in the dark ages of Indian democracy. She wanted to appease the western scholars so that she could get tributes. As she always say she sees the history in modern times. And the Indians before the so called Latest history are all Hindus including Atheists as atheism is considered a form of Hindu Tatva.

The scholars at present accept the reality of the Battle of ten kings as a fact but she merely says it is for cattle…. So elephants are used for mere cattle war? So print, if you want to be a great journal, you need to grab you facts.

With due respoect tp age whocxh she deserves, Ms Thapar has bene the cheerleader for the fictitious AIT, the whitewasher of various Islamic invasions. I accept that attacking countries was common those days and so was killing people.Lashing out at Habib, Governor Khan said that he had heard them quietly so they must hear what he has to say.

To this, Habib responded that he will not listen after which the Governor replied that he will be thrown out. But you cannot shout me down", Arif Mohammad Khan said after some delegates, sitting in front row protested inside the auditorium. Talking to the media, the Governor said that he had come with a prepared text and was going to speak from it and would not have spoken on the protests. However, he was forced to respond as some speakers before him had mentioned about the CAA protests.

Since you raised it, you are making political statements. I am under oath to protect, preserve and defend the Constitution", the Governor said. The cops also removed four student delegates from the venue only to release them later. Times Now. Follow us on :.

Perfect365 one-tap makeover mod apk

Now you will decide who I should quote or not quote: Kerala Governor. But you cannot shout me down'. The Newshour Agenda. Finolex chairman Prakash. PM Modi and CMs are likely to get vaccine jabs in the second step of the inoculation drive. Boy set ablaze by Dad for not taking studies seriously. Mohammed Siraj pays emotional tribute to late father. Indo-French exercise Desert Knight beginning today.By Balbir Punj. I have only seen the news report of the release of the book brought out by a prestigious Kerala newspaper.

An English rendering of the book, one hopes, will soon be out. Youths clamour atop the 16th century Muslim Babri Mosque five hours before the structure was completely demolished in December Mohammad, who was in charge of the excavations in Ayodhya, has revealed two important things: one, the Left historians of the day led by Prof Irfan Habib ensured that the proposal to hand over the site to the Hindu community did not succeed. They encouraged the extremist view among Muslims against any peaceful transfer.

Such an agreed transfer was one of the solutions being considered between and The conclusion was based on the evidence of, among other things, basalt stone pillars with the Hindu symbol of Poorna Kalasha in the construction of the mosque structure and underneath it. This matter has been discussed so often and in so detail that we need not go into it.

Under the successive Congress governments at the Centre, distortion of Indian history through the ancient technique of suppressio vary, suggestio falsy, has been turned into a fine art by the so-called secularists.

The Left historians have done much damage to Indian history in many other ways. They have sought to obfuscate the terrible pain inflicted by successive Muslim invaders on the majority population of the country and the choice these invaders placed before the people: convert or be killed. Nobody in his senses would suggest that the present-day followers of the religion should pay for the sins of their ancestors.

But at least a seeker of truth would agree that what academicians should present is the fact and leave the interpretation to others. One readily agrees that the present values should not be applied to the past generation.

For the left movement, ideology is supreme, while truth and facts are secondary. Interpretation of ideology is obviously the prerogative of the leadership. Needless to say, the caucus of the day controlling the organisation constitutes the leadership. Understanding of history, economics, human relations, international affairs, in short all aspects of life, becomes subordinate to the whims of those at the helm. As a result, there is usually an ocean of difference between what the Left preaches and practises.A set of scholars has released a statement condemning the 'pernicious imposition by the Leftist School of a 'legislated history',' which they believe has presented an 'alienating and debilitating self-image' to generations of Indian students, and promoted contempt for their civilisational heritage.

The straitjacketing of history or looking at its progress as part of a pattern must be counted as the single biggest failure of the human intellect. It is one thing when you are trying to understand whether the past follows a pattern, it's quite another when you make it an article of faith.

Other events, though far more significant in terms of impact, get ignored. The Leftist historians in India appear in some sort of compulsion to narrate history from the Marxist perspective. That obviously involves amplifying what fit into the theoretical paradigm and excluding what doesn't.

Either way it is scholarship which ends up as the victim. They say the Leftist approach is inherently hypocritical and condescending towards any other view of history and the view that everything was bright and golden about India's past is equally flawed. These scholars have also launched an online petition for those who wish to express their support to the statement. The petition can be accessed here.

Statement on Hypocrisy and Indian History - Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison. This is the tragedy of Arundhati Roy: the very legitimate issues she raises are swept aside by the knee-jerk loathing she provokes.

A great part of the blame rests on her shoulders, but that doesn't let the rest of us off the hook. The school education syllabus committee of the Trinamool government has decided to abolish the German philosopher, Marx, from the higher secondary history syllabus.

The Left can still stage a comeback on the national stage. But a lot depends on how it re-positions its ideology in the context of a changing India. Firstpost Conversations 9 Months S. Home India News. Life Reading Arundhati Roy: The high price of toxic rage This is the tragedy of Arundhati Roy: the very legitimate issues she raises are swept aside by the knee-jerk loathing she provokes.The allegation made by Dr KK Muhammed, former Regional Director North of Archaeological Survey of India, in his autobiography titled Njan Enna Bharatiyan I an Indian in Malayalam also claim that remains of a Hindu temple were found during the excavation made by a team of archaeologists headed by Professor BB Lal, then director general of the Archaeological Survey of India duringin which he was also a member.

Twenty four years after the demolition of Babri Masjid, a former archaeologist has come out with the allegation that Left historians like Irfan Habib and Romila Thapar had thwarted an amicable settlement to the Babri Masjid issue.

leftist historians in india

The autobiography released on Sunday has become a debating point among historians in Kerala. While renowned historian MGS Narayanan fully agree with Muhammed, Left centric historians like Dr KN Panikkar dubbed the arguments raised by the author as baseless and aimed at giving leverage to the BJP which is making all out efforts to open an account in Kerala assembly in the upcoming election.

Besides blaming the Left wing historians for failing to reach an amicable settlement in the Babri Masjid issue, the book also brings to focus the longstanding rift between historians supporting the Marxist view and others opposed to it. A set of historians including Romila Thapar, Bipin Chandra and S Gopal argued that there was no mention of the dismantling of the temple before 19th century and Ayodhya is Bhudhist-Jain centre.

Some of them even took part in several government-level meetings and supported the Babri Masjid Action Committee," he said. Muhammed endorses in his book that a temple existed at the site of the Babri Masjid based on the unearthing of temple pillars during the excavation under Professor Lal in In the chapter "Whatever I learned and said are nothing but historical truth", Muhammed says that he got a chance to be part of an excavation team led by Lal in He was a student at the School of Archaeology in New Delhi at that time.

Indian history: a Leftist fief

All these pillars had domes carved on them. The domes resembled those found in temples belonging to 11th and 12th century. In the temple architecture domes are one of the nine symbols of prosperity. It was quite evident that the Masjid was erected on the debris of a temple. I went on writing to several English dailies in those days about the finding. Only one news paper published my view and that too in the letters to Editor column," says the book. According to Muhammed that the Left historians even tried to mislead the Allahabad High Court on the issue.

Even after the court had pronounced its verdict Irfan and his team were not ready to accept the truth.

2pm pst converted to est

They simply questioned the logicality of the verdict. After all historians are mere historians, it is we the archaeologists who provide them the data," he said adding that even Qutub Minar and Taj Mahal were built on the debris of Hindu temples. Asked if his book would not fan up communal hatred, Muhammed sounded negative.

Besides, communalism in Hindu religion is not fundamental in nature but a spontaneous reaction.It was the tenth anniversary of the historic revolution in Russia that shook the world by establishing that the real power lay in the hands of common people who could rise up to overthrow their exploiters. The future prime minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru paid his first ever visit to the land of socialism that he had been studying minutely since the earliest days of the revolution.

In Russia, Nehru strove to find a solution to the struggles of a colonised India. He studied the works of Marx and Lenin and admitted that he was greatly influenced by their ideologies of development. By the second decade of the twentieth century, Indians were slowly but steadily acquainting themselves with the Gandhian philosophy of peaceful confrontation as a means to overpower their colonial rulers.

The Russian revolution, however, set in a new course in the trajectory of nationalist struggle. The Marxist ideology of the working class, overthrowing the propertied exploiter, by sheer force, struck a chord deep within the hearts of the agitators of nationalism.

Chancel screens since the reformation

The appeal was almost uniform among all those looking for an alternative to the Gandhian mode of peaceful demonstration, and in fact, inspired even a staunch Gandhian like Nehru. The aggressive revolutionary, Bhagat Singh, is noted to have studied in detail the life of Lenin and the Communist Manifesto during his time in jail.

So deep was his attachment to the Russian philosophy, that his last wish was to complete reading the life of Lenin. The history of Left politics in India runs deep into the very heart of the freedom struggle. It can hardly be denied that both the freedom struggle and the political landscape of free India was for the longest period of time hued in various shades of red.

You need to think of the cultural specificity of the context in which you are talking about ideology. For instance, Periyar drew on empowerment of underprivileged.

During its initial days, the CPI focused on mobilising peasants and workers towards a revolutionary cause, while at the same time influencing the Congress in developing a sturdy Left leaning ideology. However, having its roots in the international Communist movement meant that the CPI struggled hard to keep its feet rooted in the nationalist movement. Trouble arose when in the s Gandhi launched the Quit India movement against the British almost at the same time when the Soviet Union urged the CPI to back the British war efforts in the fight against Fascism.

In their efforts to please the Russians, they alienated themselves from the nationalist struggle. Post-Independence though, the party sprung back to form leading armed struggles in several principalities where the princely rulers were reluctant to give up on power.

Most noteworthy among these was the rebellion against the Nizam of Hyderabad. In Manipur and Bihar too, the party made its ideological impact felt strong in terms of the agrarian and trade union movements they led. Byit realised the need to occupy the space of governance rather than just the streets and decided to embrace parliamentary politics.

Having been successful in garnering enough support among some sections of the Indian population, it soon emerged as the first leading opposition party that the Congress faced. Soon after, the party experienced its first-ever electoral success in the state of Kerala in the Legislative Assembly elections. Two decades later the party gained a footing in West Bengal and soon after in Tripura.

497d tampines ave 7

By the early s, however, the international conditions affecting Communism had altered yet again, the ripples of which would be felt strongly in the Left politics of India. The Soviet Union and China two most important Communist powers of the world were at daggers drawn over ideological implications of Left politics.

The Chinese, led by Mao Zedong, denounced the Russians for leaning towards the West as a diplomatic means of spreading Communism, rather than leading to an armed struggle.

leftist historians in india

The ideological conflict between the two countries had its immediate effect on the CPI, drawing sturdy lines between those who leaned towards a Soviet philosophy and those who supported the Chinese. The political soil in India too was conducive to the conflict within the CPI. The Indo-China border war in affected the politics within the party with one section backing Nehru, while the other radical section opposed to what they believed was an unqualified aggression towards China.

Three years after the split ofhowever, there was yet another dissension within the CPI-M, with a faction of radicals claiming that the party, engrossed in parliamentary politics, had given up on the original cause of armed revolution. Inthis group, led by Charu Mazumdar led violent attacks at Naxalbari in North Bengal in an effort to replicate a Chinese revolution.

The movement was soon crushed when the CPI-M, which was at that moment part of a coalition government in Bengal, came down heavily upon it, ironically accusing it of drawing inspiration from Mao, rather than following what India stood for.

In Tripura too the CPI-M came to power inand except a brief moment of Congress rule between andthe state was governed by the Left up until the overthrown by the BJP earlier this month. Interestingly, while the Congress and the Left kept tussling for power in these three states, they were rather insulated from the approach of saffron in their territory for years. He extended the same argument to Kerala as well, where he said historically, a rich cultural tradition of internationalism existed that could not cohabit with the ideological leanings of the Jan Sangh or the BJP that was rooted in a nationalist spirit.